Since losing the 2020 election, President Donald Trump has put forward a lot of ideas to change how America votes.
Some, like hand-counting all ballots, are nonstarters. Others, like restricting mail-in voting, have proven a tough sell in states where it’s popular, including Republican-leaning ones. And a handful have become mainstream Republican positions, including imposing stricter voter ID and requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.
Democrats have generally opposed those proposals, arguing that they would do more to make voting harder than to prevent the relatively rare cases of election fraud.
But one Trump proposal deserves a second look: speeding up election results.
Election results often come in slowly because officials are verifying signatures on mail-in ballots, allowing more time for ones sent by Election Day to arrive and giving voters whose ballots were initially rejected opportunities to fix the issue and have them counted. Those are important safeguards for both access and accuracy. But there are other ways to get faster results that don’t have those trade-offs.
Dismissing the goal of faster results carries its own risks. Polls show overwhelming support for faster election night results among both Democrats and Republicans. Research indicates that unexpectedly slow vote counts can undermine trust in the results. And there are ways to speed up results considerably without making it harder for people to cast their ballots and get them counted.
Read Ryan Teague Beckwith’s analysis here.